Beware of getting lost in the logistics. For example, it is rarely a good idea to indicate which hand or foot was used; the important thing is that A hand or foot was used. Otherwise, the reader has to stop and think about which hand is the left one.
— twitch.tv/fictionmydiction
◆
Comments
Loading comments…
📖 Notes & analysis
The deeper reason this works is that readers build a mental movie as they go, and specificity that doesn't serve the story forces them to pause and animate a detail that adds nothing. "She reached out with her left hand" makes the brain stop, check which hand that is, picture it, then move on — a tiny tax paid for no narrative interest. Compare that to "She reached out and gripped the rail," which flows because the action matters, not the anatomy performing it. The caution: don't swing so far toward vagueness that you lose grounding entirely. If a character is specifically left-handed and that fact pays off later — she can't hold the gun steady, she favors a cane on one side — then naming the hand becomes essential information, not clutter. The test is always whether the detail earns its place.
Comments